Enhanced Or Natural
In this Insight I’m asking the questions behind Sky Replacement and if it belongs in the grading suite.
The first question I’m asking is how easy are they to do in Resolve which I explain in the insight below in case you have never tried them before.
The second question I’m asking is should we do them?
You can download the Red clip here to try grading yourself before watching my video insight below.
You can also download the sky here.
Before you watch my video please have a go at the clip yourself!
The one I’m using is the RED One Mysterium clip from the above link.
Reward vs Effort
I’m more than happy to do a sky replacement in my grading suite if the shot genuinely calls for it.
I normally try not to do this on front of my clients, as much as I love them all as soon as I start sky replacing they get carried away.
All of a sudden I’m spending the day tracking and replacing skies in 27 shots.
I also feel like resolve needs a few more tool refinements and additions to help blend the edges on some difficult shots.
I’m asking you all what is your position on it both attended and unattended?
For those of you who have never tried it before in the video below I cover :
- Replacing A Sky In A Static Shot
- Tracking Your Sky Into A Moving Shot
- Using Compound Clips To Grade Composited Shots
I guess my final thoughts are that sky replacing in the grade is only as easy as the hardest shot in the whole timeline.
If you can’t make that one work don’t even try the easy ones.
If you’ve got any questions, be sure to leave a comment!